And now for the political question doctrine.
See fn. 2., I believe at one point Mr. Jensen was complaining that the military judge wasn’t going to apply any “civilian” cases.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b011/4b01178b2a57ec06e36fdc6c318a805476a4a648" alt="image image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62f3e/62f3ed59705dc52f03ab5ceecafd85afd6cf763f" alt="image image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20692/20692b1efa3fe30b89ef48b5d6906903ac6330b7" alt="image image"
See fn. 3., for the judge’s rather sparse treatment of the de facto officer doctrine.