Here are two items of potential interest to military justice practitioners from Volume 68 VANDERBILT L. REV.
Todd Haugh, Overcriminalization’s New Harm Paradigm, 68 Vand. L. Rev. 1191 (2015).
Joshua D. Foote, Hung Up on Words: A Conduct-Based Solution to the Problem of Conspiracy in Military Commissions, 68 Vand. L. Rev. 1367 (2015).
Here is another case where a military prisoner has sought habeas corpus relief, in the Kansas District Court (the Tenth Circuit).
Valois v. Commandant, USDB
The case provides a fascinating discussion of the maze and complexities of DoD and Service regulations the award of good time credit, work abatement, and such, applicable to clients confined at the USDB.
More information here.
I’m a believer in Restorative Justice. In America The Vengeful this is an approach much derided and ignored. In my view that means the exacters of “justice” don’t really care much about the victim. Anyway, there are many facets to the concept one of them is repairing what has been done wrong. For the victim this may well include receiving a genuine apology. The problem in criminal cases is when to make the apology. I have developed several ways to do this without the apology becoming evidence. Here is an interesting article about the timing of the apology (and it’s consistent with part of my approach).
Michael C. Jones, Can I Say I’m Sorry? Examining the Potential of an Apology Privilege in Criminal Law. Comprehensive Law – Fall 2012 Phoenix School of Law.
In United States v. Starovoytov, the accused plead guilty.
[T]of 5 charges and 18 specifications involving sodomy with children between the ages of 12 and 16, aggravated sexual abuse of children, abusive sexual contact of a child, indecent liberties with children, possessing and producing child pornography, and providing alcohol to persons under the age of 21, in violation of Articles 120, 125, and 134, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 920, 925, 934.
He was sentenced to
Even in Canada prosecutors play Discovery Games.
No. 16-0053/AF. U.S. v. Shelby L. Williams. CCA 38454. Notice is hereby given that a certificate for review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals was filed under Rule 22 on this date on the following issues:
Today the court informed us that the Chief Justice approved our request to extend the time to file the petition until 13 December 2015.
I don’t often look at the Naval Justice School site, less robust than it used to be. But today I did decide to see if there is a new issue of the Naval Law Review. Sure enough, there’s an article of interest to military justice practitioners. You’ll have to scroll down to page 67, it’s not hyperlinked.
The notorious CDR (judge)(Art. 32 IO) Monahan has this piece.
A PROPOSAL TO CONFORM MILITARY RULE OF EVIDENCE 305 IN LIGHT OF THE SUPREME COURT’S HOLDINGS IN MARYLAND V. SHATZER AND BERGHUIS V. THOMPKINS
Court-Martial Trial Practice Blog
