United States v. Gipson, ARMY 2007 0521 (A. Ct. Crim. App. 28 September 2009).
This case has an unusual [if mundane] procedural history.. . .
Appellant claims on appeal he was prejudiced by the SJA’s failure to serve him with new matters in the addendum, in violation of R.C.M. 1106(f)(7); and this court erred in its Reinert holding that (1) the government’s writ of prohibition was an extraordinary matter, and (2) the military judge did not have authority to grant appellant additional days of confinement.