Close

Court-Martial Trial Practice Blog

Updated:

An appeals court cannot take judicial notice of an element of the offense

The CAAF has decided United States v. Paul, 74 M.J. ___ (C.A.A.F. May 29, 2014)(CAAFLog case page).  The granted issue was: WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED WHEN IT TOOK JUDICIAL NOTICE OF AN ELEMENT OF A CHARGE IN VIOLATION OF GARNER v. LOUISIANA, 368 U.S. 157 (1961) AND…

Updated:

Confrontation confrontation

What are the full limits of confrontation when it comes to scientific and expert testimony.   Federal evidence blog notes: In denying certiorari review (this week0  in eleven cases raising Confrontation Clause and expert testimony issues, for the foreseeable future the Supreme Court will not resolve a significant issue that has been dividing the…

Updated:

Navy self reporting–Redux

By regulation (the U.S. Navy Regulations and the Navy’s Standard Organization and Regulations Manual (SORM), OPNAVINST 3120.32x,), the Navy required personnel to report having been arrested or prosecutions for criminal acts by civilian authorities. In United States v. Serianne, 68 M.J.580 (N.M.Ct.Crim.App. 2009), aff’d, 69 M.J. 8 (C.A.A.F. 2010). the courts found the order unlawful, in…

Updated:

Interesting AF stats on military justice

With the ongoing politics surrounding sexual assault in the military, and whether the commander should remain as the disciplinary decision maker, the AF has done an interesting review of (convictions). After a spate of sex-related incidents last year, the Air Force reviewed all courts-martial from the previous three years —…

Contact Us
Start Chat