Close

Court-Martial Trial Practice Blog

Updated:

Prosecutor discipline?

Remember Napue v. Illinois, 360 U.S. 264 (1959)?  Here’s the Justia summary. At petitioner’s trial in a state court in which he was convicted of murder, the principal state witness, an accomplice then serving a 199-year sentence for the same murder, testified in response to a question by the Assistant State’s…

Updated:

Worth your read-pretrial agreements

Military law and practice requires that any pretrial agreement discussions be conducted between the defense, the prosecutors, and the convening authority.  The military judge is not allowed to be involved.  The military judge’s involvement is during trial when she reviews a PTA with the accused to ensure it is all…

Updated:

Is it IAC

The Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces has granted a petition on the following issue: WHETHER APPELLANT RECEIVED INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE WHEN DEFENSE COUNSEL FAILED TO INTRODUCE EVIDENCE WHICH STRONGLY CORROBORATED THE DEFENSE THEORY THAT THE ALLEGATIONS IN THIS CASE WERE FALSE. Here is a link to the AFCCA opinion…

Posted in: IAC
Updated:

More bullets for you less for the enemy

Sgt. Maj. of the Army Ray Chandler announced this week that senior enlisted personnel would be rated on their ability to police online social media activity, in what many are nicknaming the “Facebook bullet” on the non-commissioned officer report (NCOER). So reports Duffelblog.  I’ve always been of the view that…

Updated:

An important reminder of what is inconsistent

If a witness testifies at trial the traffic light was red, the accused may ask if they told the police officer the light was green.  And, depending on the answer the accused may offer extrinsic evidence of the inconsistency.  This is a clear prior inconsistent statement.  Usually there is no trouble…

Contact Us
Start Chat