Close

Court-Martial Trial Practice Blog

Updated:

Fort Gillem shooting update 5

Among others, the Virgin Islands Daily News reports that: U.S. Army officials have charged a staff sergeant in the U.S. Army Reserves, a St. Croix native, with the premeditated murder of his supervisor, who was shot multiple times last week at Fort Gillem in Georgia, where the two men were…

Updated:

Graner decided

CAAF has decided United States v. Graner.  Graner loses. We granted review in this Abu Ghraib case to determine whether the military judge abused his discretion in (1) refusing to compel the Government to produce certain memoranda requested by the defense; (2) excluding the testimony of, and an e-mail from,…

Updated:

Humor in military lawyering

Army Board for Correction of Military Records, here we come.  Actually, there’s probably no requirement to start there I suppose. The OCWeekly reports that: Taitz has also been pining for recently sacked U.S. general Stanley McChrystal to give her a call. She says that McCrystal is a "perfect plaintiff to…

Updated:

Blood spatter expert

CAAF has decided United States v. Lloyd, in a 3-2 decision.  The majority determined that the defense had not sufficiently shown the need for a blood spatter expert.  Chief Judge Effron writing for himself and Judge Baker dissented.  I see this as a fact based decision and not stating any…

Updated:

Michigan v. Bryant

Professor Friedman alerts that two amicus briefs have been filed.  The link to his brief does not work, but the one to NACDL does.  As a reminder the QP is: Whether statements to investigating police officers accusing someone of a crime and describing the offense after it has been completed…

Updated:

Up periscope

Army Times reports that: Three officers given letters of reprimand for the deadly July 13, 2008, battle in Wanat, Afghanistan, have been exonerated and the letters withdrawn, the Army announced June 23. Gen. Charles Campbell, who recently relinquished command of Forces Command and is preparing to retire, “withdrew, cancelled and…

Updated:

Post-trial administrative discharges

CAAF’s journal for 22 June 2010 notes: No. 10-0468/AR. U.S. v. Sonya M. WATSON. CCA 20080175. Review granted on the following issue: WHETHER THE ARMY COURT ERRED WHEN IT RULED THAT APPELLANT’S ADMINISTRATIVE DISCHARGE WAS VOIDABLE AND PROPERLY REVOKED AND DID NOT REMIT THE ADJUDGED DISMISSAL. Briefs will be filed…

Contact Us
Start Chat