Many years ago I bought a small book, “How to lie with statistics,” by Darrell Huff. I see that a newer edition (1993) is available at Amazon. The edition I have is more in the form of a primer, without a lot of detail, but you can get the point.…
Articles Posted in Up Periscope
Worth the read
Massive round-up of new law articles, covering privacy, Fourth Amendment, GPS, cell site, cybercrime, big data, revenge porn, drones, and more from
What’s good for the police might be good for you
This item is in the latest issue of the FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin. Christian Mason, Tod W. Burke, Ph.D., and Stephen S. Owen, Ph.D., Responding to Persons with Mental Illness: Can Screening Checklists Aid Law Enforcement? You encounter clients who may have a definable disorder or witnesses.
Is it harder?
Here’s a question. Is it harder for a commander to engage in UCI before of the information age – for example the availability of smartphones, small recorders, and social media. Apparently for some that may a yes. Former Top Officers Say Internet Age Limits Meddling in Sexual Assault Cases.
Worth the read
Taking Mistakes Seriously, Paul J. Larkin Jr. The Heritage Foundation January 13, 2014 28 B.Y.U. J. of Pub. L. (2014) (Forthcoming) Abstract: There are two very different mistake doctrines in the law. The common law doctrine that ignorance of the law is no excuse gives no weight to reasonable, good faith…
Impeachment with prior inconsistent
One of my favorite bloggers, Professor Colin Miller has this: Arizona Rule of Evidence 801(d)(1)(A) provides that A statement is not hearsay if…[t]he declarant testifies at the trial or hearing…and is subject to cross-examination concerning the statement, and the statement is…inconsistent with the declarant’s testimony So, let’s say that an alleged victim…
who is the victim
No. 14-0134/AR. U.S. v. Brett M. GASKILL. CCA 20110028. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, and in light of United States v. Lubasky, 68 M.J. 260 (C.A.A.F. 2010), we note that the proper victim in Specifications 2, 3, and…
Beware trial defense counsel
The CAAF has decided United States v. Moss. The decision involves jurisdiction to appeal to CAAF for a Soldier who was AWOL at trial, apparently AWOL at the time the case was heard at ACCA, and AWOL at the time her appellate defense counsel petitioned CAAF. Read the case. It…
In the Supremes
SCOTUSBlog notes the following criminal law related petitions at the Court which may – or may not – be granted tomorrow. Warger v. Shauers 13-517 Issue: Whether Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b) permits a party moving for a new trial based on juror dishonest during voir dire to introduce juror testimony…
Good character is admissible
Despite Congress’s meddling with certain rules of evidence as a way to ensure convictions in sexual assault cases, we should consider that in almost every sexual assault case good character evidence will in fact be admissible and have a role. We are constrained to sustain the assignments which complain of…