DMLHS at CAAFLog is reporting a decision in United States v. Lee. NMCCA did not find error on any of the reasons advocated by the appellant. However, they set-aside the findings and authorized a rehearing. DMLHS notes that Capt Lee was represented by a non-Code 45 advocate: I listened to…
On 27 July CAAF issued a summary disposition in: No. 11-0486/NA. U.S. v. Akeem A. WILKINS. CCA 201000289. Review granted on the following issue: WHETHER APPELLANT’S RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS OF LAW WAS VIOLATED WHEN HE WAS CONVICTED FOR ABUSIVE SEXUAL CONTACT AS A LESSER INCLUDED OFFENSE OF AGGRAVATED SEXUAL…
Take a look at United States v. Magnon, in which NMCCA finds that a prosecutors closing argument on the merits was: The trial counsel’s argument was inartful; it was not a model of how a trial counsel should close his case; and it was improper. While portions of his argument…
Where are we at. CrimProfBlog brings us: Cicchini on the Confrontation Clause Michael D. Cicchini has posted Dead Again: The Latest Demise of the Confrontation Clause (Fordham Law Review, Vol. 80, 2011) on SSRN. Here is the abstract: In Crawford v. Washington, the Supreme Court abandoned its Roberts “reliability” approach…
Federal Evidence Review brings to us a useful argument about the “notorious” slippery slope between propensity evidence and evidence admitted under Mil. R. Evid. 404(b). I’ve noted elsewhere the tendency of prosecutors of making talismanic assertions that, “it’s evidence of intent, motive, modus, your honor.” The defense and judges need…
In United States v. McLean, the AFFCA determined that aggravated assault is an LIO of maiming. The defense theory on appeal, but not at trial, was that the AA was not a listed LIO (an issue addressed in Jones). Just because it is or isn’t listed as an LIO in…
Richard Gabriel was the defense jury consultant in that case. Here is his piece on the case. Many of the hosts and regular guests of the HLN have admitted that they believed Casey Anthony to be guilty either before or during the trial. And it was with this prejudgment that…
Brown v. United States. Petitioner sought relief for insufficiency of proof on a rape conviction and recalculation of some sentence credit. Petitioner now claims his pretrial confinement was 230 days instead of 210, and seeks adjustment by this court of his military sentence. As respondents point out, however, petitioner failed…
The new online edition of The Jury Expert has several articles of interest to the trial practitioner. Narrative Persuasion in Legal Settings. The authors note the extensive research on rhetorical or argument based communications to the “jury” with narrative communications. While the research into narrative argument is relatively young, there…
San Antonio News-Express reports: Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan won’t go on trial until March, but the Army already has selected 12 potential jurors. The jury, however, isn’t coming from Fort Hood, where Hasan is accused of gunning down 45 people in a 2009 shooting spree. In what attorneys say is…