More on LTC Lakin from the motions hearing

September 8, 2010

I posted a tease here, and it didn’t take long for Dwight “My Liege” Sullivan to crack the code.

In other words, Judge Lind used the word “embarrassment” in precisely the political question doctrine context (and using almost exactly the same words) as CAAF in New and the Supremes in Baker v. Carr.  And all the breathless birther commentary saying that she was attempting to avoid personal embarrassment to President Obama is just so much guano.

As always one has to admire Dwight’s pithy commentary.  OK, here is some more (working from a “bigger” computer, netbooks have some limitations).

Here’s the military judge’s summary of what the defense was asking for:

image thumb2 More on LTC Lakin from the motions hearing image thumb3 More on LTC Lakin from the motions hearing image thumb4 More on LTC Lakin from the motions hearing image thumb5 More on LTC Lakin from the motions hearing

Related posts:

  1. LTC Lakin is spinning
  2. Should LTC Lakin be embarrassed?
  3. More confessions and admissions coming
  4. LTC Lakin
  5. LTC Lakin

{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

1 HORUS 09.13.10 at 08:19

Birthers do NOT understand the Constitution or Law.

It is up to them to prove the President is not eligible to serve, not for the President to prove that he is.

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Previous post:

Next post:

Thesis WordPress Theme